DPP with No-Code vs Traditional Development: Which to Choose?

When deciding how to implement Digital Product Passports (DPPs), you have two main options: no-code platforms or custom-built development. Each fits different needs based on your budget, timeline, and technical complexity. Here’s the key takeaway:

• No-Code Platforms: Quick to set up, cost-effective, and easy to use. Ideal for small to medium-sized businesses (SMEs) with straightforward needs and tight deadlines, such as meeting EU sustainability regulations. However, they offer less flexibility and control.
• Custom Development: Tailored to complex requirements, offering deep integration with existing systems and advanced security features. Best for larger corporations or industries with intricate supply chains and unique compliance needs. It requires significant investment and time.

Quick Comparison

Factor	No-Code Platforms	Custom Development
Setup Time	Days to weeks	Months
Initial Cost	Low (subscription-based)	High (SEK 500,000+)
Customisation	Limited	Full
Integration	Standard connectors	Deep, custom integrations
Scalability	Automatic scaling	Requires infrastructure upgrades
Technical Expertise	Minimal	High
Maintenance	Provider-managed	In-house or external teams required

If you’re a Swedish SME looking to comply with regulations like the EU Battery Regulation (2027), no-code platforms can get you started quickly. However, for industries like electronics or advanced manufacturing, custom systems are better suited for handling complex supply chains and sensitive data.

Think about your budget, timeline, and business goals before choosing. For some, starting with no-code and transitioning to custom solutions over time could be a smart move.

What Are Digital Product Passports?

Definition and Purpose of DPPs

A Digital Product Passport (DPP) is a digital record that tracks a product’s journey from the sourcing of raw materials all the way to its end-of-life. These passports are typically accessed through digital identifiers like QR codes or NFC tags, ensuring important product details are always available.

DPPs play a key role in improving supply chain transparency and traceability. For example, scanning a product’s QR code can reveal information about its material composition, origin, or environmental footprint. This level of transparency enables businesses to verify product claims and helps consumers make better-informed purchasing decisions.

The benefits of DPPs extend to a wide range of stakeholders. Manufacturers can use them to ensure quality and meet regulatory requirements. Retailers can confirm product authenticity and sustainability credentials, while recyclers gain access to technical details needed for proper dismantling. Regulators, on the other hand, can use DPPs to monitor compliance with environmental standards. For Swedish companies, especially those involved in exports, adopting these digital tools is becoming increasingly important to stay competitive.

Core Components of DPPs

A reliable DPP system is built around several essential components:

• Data Carriers: These include physical tags like QR codes, NFC, or RFID chips that securely link a product to its digital record. For instance, a clothing brand might print a QR code on a garment’s care label, while an electronics manufacturer could embed an NFC tag in a device.
• Data Architecture: This determines how the information is stored and accessed. Many DPP systems integrate with existing business tools like ERP software, often using distributed systems to balance transparency with security.
• Compliance Standards: Standardised formats and protocols ensure DPPs can work across different systems and industries. For example, certain products may require specific data formats to include metrics like environmental impact or recycling details.
• Access Controls: DPPs often use tiered access levels. Basic product details might be public, while sensitive manufacturing data is restricted to authorised users. These controls also help meet data protection regulations like GDPR.
• Integration Capabilities: A robust DPP system connects seamlessly with other business tools such as Product Information Management (PIM) systems and ERP platforms. This ensures the digital record stays accurate as the product evolves.

These components lay the foundation for a wide range of practical applications across industries.

DPP Applications by Industry

Different sectors use DPPs to address their specific needs and challenges:

• Textiles and Fashion: In this industry, DPPs can document material origins, manufacturing conditions, and care instructions. This helps verify sustainability claims while giving consumers a clear view of a product’s lifecycle.
• Electronics: Complex devices benefit from DPPs that include technical details for repairs, software update histories, and guidelines for disassembly. This information is particularly valuable for Sweden’s growing electronics refurbishment sector.
• Batteries: Battery manufacturers often face strict requirements to track performance, sourcing, and recycling data. DPPs for batteries might include details on capacity, environmental impact, and safety to meet evolving regulations.
• Construction Materials: A newer area for DPPs, these passports can include environmental declarations, fire safety ratings, and material composition details. This information helps Swedish architects and contractors meet sustainable building standards.

The way DPP systems are implemented varies by industry and business size. For instance, a small textile workshop might use a simple no-code solution, while a battery manufacturer with more complex needs could require a custom-developed system. Each approach ensures the DPP meets the unique demands of the business.

The Roadmap to Implementing Digital Product Passports

No-Code DPP Implementation: Benefits and Limitations

No-code platforms offer a way to deploy digital product passports (DPPs) quickly, without needing deep technical knowledge. These platforms rely on visual tools and pre-built components, making it possible to create functional DPP systems without traditional coding skills.

Benefits of No-Code Platforms for DPPs

No-code platforms like Blippa allow businesses to launch DPP systems in just days or weeks, meeting urgent demands from both regulators and the market. For Swedish companies preparing for upcoming EU sustainability regulations, this rapid setup can be a game-changer.

Another advantage is cost savings. Hiring developers or contractors for traditional software development can easily cost hundreds of thousands of kronor, even for smaller projects. In contrast, no-code platforms often use subscription pricing, offering predictable monthly fees that simplify budgeting and reduce upfront expenses.

These tools also empower teams like product managers or sustainability officers to update DPP data directly, eliminating the need to rely on developers. This independence means updates can happen faster, keeping information current and relevant.

Many no-code platforms come with built-in connectors that integrate seamlessly with ERP and PIM systems, ensuring smooth data flow and cutting down on manual work. Features like QR code generation further simplify the process of creating and managing DPPs.

Collaboration tools make it easier for distributed teams to work together, while the platform’s managed infrastructure supports scaling from a handful of products to thousands. For Swedish businesses working with external partners across supply chains, this shared infrastructure simplifies operations. Since the platform provider handles server capacity, security updates, and performance optimization, teams can focus on their products rather than IT concerns.

However, while these benefits make no-code platforms attractive, there are some limitations that could affect their suitability for more complex or long-term projects.

Limitations of No-Code DPP Development

One major drawback is limited customization. No-code platforms often restrict how much users can tailor the system to meet unique needs. This can make it difficult to implement specific business logic or specialized features, forcing companies to adapt their processes to the platform’s capabilities.

Integration with custom APIs, legacy systems, or third-party services that aren’t supported by standard connectors can also be challenging. For companies relying on proprietary or highly specialized technology, maintaining real-time data consistency across systems may become problematic.

Scalability can be another issue. As DPP systems grow more complex or handle larger data volumes, performance bottlenecks may appear, potentially slowing down operations.

Security concerns also come into play. Since the platform provider manages security, companies might find it harder to meet strict compliance standards like GDPR. This is particularly concerning for organizations handling sensitive data, such as manufacturing details or customer information. With cybercrime projected to cost $10.5 trillion globally by 2025, relying on a third party for security can feel risky.

Vendor lock-in is another challenge. Because users typically don’t own the source code, moving to a custom-built solution later can be complicated. The lack of direct control over the codebase limits flexibility and makes transitions more difficult.

Finally, performance can be a concern. Applications built with no-code tools sometimes suffer from inefficiencies in the underlying code, which can lead to slower execution times – especially for complex tasks like advanced algorithms or intricate decision-making processes.

When to Use No-Code for DPPs

Deciding whether to use a no-code platform for DPPs depends on weighing the benefits against the limitations.

For small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with straightforward data needs and tight budgets, no-code platforms are a practical choice. For instance, a Swedish fashion brand with a small team could use Blippa to manage DPPs for an entire product line without needing to hire developers. These platforms allow non-technical teams – such as those in marketing, sustainability, or customer service – to take charge of updates, keeping product information accurate and up to date.

No-code platforms also work well for companies that need to act quickly. Businesses facing tight regulatory deadlines or competitive pressures can benefit from the rapid deployment these tools offer. This speed allows them to test and refine their DPP systems before committing to larger investments, making it a smart option for those navigating immediate EU sustainability requirements.

However, for businesses with more complex needs – such as extensive legacy integrations or highly specialized functionalities – a custom-built solution may be the better choice in the long run.

Traditional Development for DPP Systems: Benefits and Limitations

Traditional development involves creating DPP (Digital Product Passport) systems using custom code and architecture. Unlike no-code platforms, this approach provides complete control but requires significant resources and technical expertise.

Benefits of Traditional Development

One of the main advantages of traditional development is full customization. Custom-built systems can be tailored to meet specific business needs, industry standards, and complex data structures. This adaptability makes it easier for companies to align their DPP systems with international standards and evolving regulatory requirements.

Another key benefit is deep integration capabilities. Traditional development allows for seamless connections with existing enterprise systems, such as ERP, PIM, IoT platforms, and legacy systems. For Swedish manufacturers managing diverse systems, this integration ensures efficient data exchange across complex supply chains.

Security is another area where traditional development shines. Advanced features like AES-256 encryption, blockchain integration, and zero-knowledge proofs can be implemented, which is especially critical for businesses handling sensitive information or complying with GDPR.

In November 2025, Liebherr Group‘s Heavy Machinery Division transitioned from QR codes to NTAG 424 NFC tags integrated with PTC‘s ThingWorx. This change led to 50% faster field inspections and eliminated label replacements over two years.

For companies managing complex, multi-tier supply chains, traditional development provides the control needed to track materials, monitor production processes, and manage lifecycle data in real time. Achieving this level of detail is often difficult with simpler solutions.

Large enterprises with extensive IT infrastructures often choose traditional development for its scalability and ability to handle high data volumes. These systems are built to support long-term growth while ensuring compliance with strict regulations.

Limitations of Traditional Development

Custom systems require a significant upfront investment. Costs include digitizing legacy data, developing integrations, training staff, and implementing cybersecurity measures. These expenses can add up quickly.

Complex integration needs are another challenge. Connecting DPP systems to existing legacy platforms like PLM, ERP, and CRM can take months, depending on the complexity of the environment. This process demands careful planning and collaboration across departments.

As businesses grow, scalability can become an issue. While traditional systems can be designed to scale, doing so often requires significant investments in infrastructure and integration capabilities.

The technical complexity of traditional development also poses challenges. Building systems that meet EU requirements for open, machine-readable, and structured DPP data demands skilled developers and data specialists. For Swedish SMEs without in-house technical teams, this can be a major hurdle.

Development timelines for custom systems are longer due to the extensive planning, building, and integration required – making it difficult for companies with tight regulatory deadlines.

Maintenance is another ongoing challenge. Unlike no-code platforms where providers handle updates and security patches, custom systems require dedicated teams or external contractors to manage updates, troubleshoot, and ensure compliance.

These factors make traditional development most suitable for enterprises with strong IT resources and long-term strategic goals.

When to Use Traditional Development for DPPs

Traditional development is ideal for organizations with complex product portfolios and stringent compliance standards. Large enterprises with extensive supply chains or companies needing advanced security and specialized integrations benefit from the flexibility and control custom solutions provide.

Businesses with unique requirements, such as tailored business logic or specialized compliance features, should consider traditional development when off-the-shelf platforms fall short.

For industries handling sensitive or proprietary data – like defence, pharmaceuticals, or advanced manufacturing – advanced security measures are critical. Swedish companies in these sectors often find traditional development essential for meeting their data protection needs.

Organizations planning for a long-term DPP strategy, as opposed to quick deployment, may also find traditional development more suitable. While the initial costs are higher, owning the source code and maintaining control over the system can provide better adaptability as needs evolve.

Finally, companies with existing technical teams and strong IT infrastructures are well-equipped to leverage traditional development. In-house expertise can ensure custom solutions integrate seamlessly with current systems, delivering a tailored, efficient approach.

sbb-itb-256b3ff

No-Code vs Traditional Development: Side-by-Side Comparison

After examining the benefits and limitations of both approaches, let’s now compare no-code and traditional development directly. This comparison isn’t just about technical differences – it also touches on factors like regulatory compliance, data management, and teamwork.

Comparison Across Key Factors

One major difference lies in implementation speed. No-code platforms can have you up and running in just days or weeks, which is ideal for businesses working under tight deadlines. On the other hand, traditional development often takes months to complete, as it involves designing, building, and testing systems tailored to your specific needs.

When it comes to total cost of ownership, no-code platforms usually follow a subscription model with predictable monthly or annual fees. These fees can range from a few thousand to tens of thousands of kronor per year, depending on the scale and features. Traditional development, however, requires a hefty upfront investment – often exceeding 500,000 SEK for a mid-sized project – covering development, infrastructure, security, and data migration.

Scalability is another key distinction. No-code platforms manage growth for you, automatically adjusting to handle more data or users within the limits of your subscription. With traditional development, scaling requires careful planning and additional infrastructure investments, giving you more control but at a higher cost.

On customisation, no-code platforms offer templates and configuration options that work well for standard needs. However, traditional development lets you build systems tailored to highly specific business processes or compliance requirements, offering unmatched flexibility.

Integration capabilities also differ. No-code platforms often come with pre-built connectors for common systems like ERP or PIM, making standard integrations straightforward. Traditional development, however, supports deep, custom integrations with legacy systems, proprietary databases, or complex supply chains – essential for technical industries like manufacturing.

Maintenance requirements highlight another contrast. With no-code platforms, the provider handles updates, security patches, and infrastructure. Traditional systems, however, demand ongoing attention from technical teams or contractors to address maintenance, troubleshoot issues, and implement updates.

Factor	No-Code Platforms	Traditional Development
Implementation Time	Days to weeks	Several months
Initial Investment	Low (subscription-based)	High (typically 500,000+ SEK)
Ongoing Costs	Predictable monthly/annual fees	Variable (maintenance, hosting, updates)
Customisation	Template-based with configuration options	Fully tailored solutions
Integration Depth	Pre-built connectors	Deep, custom integrations
Scalability	Automatic within platform limits	Requires targeted infrastructure upgrades
Technical Expertise	Minimal	Significant (developers, architects)
Maintenance Responsibility	Provider-managed updates	Requires dedicated technical maintenance
Security Options	Standard encryption, GDPR compliance	Configurable advanced security measures
Regulatory Updates	Automatic provider updates	Manual implementation required

This comparison highlights how speed, customisation, and costs play a role in shaping your approach to DPP systems.

Speed vs Customisation Trade-Offs

The balance between quick deployment and tailored solutions is crucial. No-code platforms excel in speed, allowing non-technical teams to launch DPP systems quickly using pre-configured templates and drag-and-drop tools. This is especially useful when you’re racing against regulatory deadlines or testing ideas before committing to bigger investments.

However, this speed comes with limitations. If your business processes involve tracking complex product details – like multi-material products in circular economy loops or specialised verification protocols – no-code platforms might require workarounds that could affect efficiency or usability.

Traditional development offers a slower but more customised approach. The extended timeline allows for detailed planning, ensuring that data structures and workflows align perfectly with your business needs. For industries with unique compliance demands or intricate supply chains, like advanced manufacturing or pharmaceuticals, traditional development often proves to be the better choice.

Some organisations even adopt a hybrid strategy: starting with no-code for immediate compliance needs and transitioning to custom development as requirements evolve.

Cost and Resource Requirements

The cost differences between these approaches are clear. No-code platforms offer predictable subscription fees, making them easier to budget for and appealing to smaller businesses or those with limited funds. They’re a practical option for companies looking to test DPP systems without committing to large upfront expenses.

Traditional development, however, involves significant initial costs. For a mid-sized Swedish manufacturer, the first-year expenses – including development, data migration, training, and ongoing maintenance – can easily exceed 1,000,000 SEK.

Resource needs also vary. No-code platforms require minimal technical expertise, with product managers or operations staff often able to handle implementation after basic training. In contrast, traditional development demands a skilled team, including software architects, developers, database experts, and security specialists. Companies without these resources may need to hire external consultants or build internal teams.

Ultimately, your choice depends on your organisation’s priorities. If speed and simplicity are key, no-code might be the way to go. If you need deep customisation, integration, and control, traditional development could be worth the investment. Each path offers distinct advantages, and the right fit will depend on your specific goals and capabilities.

How to Choose the Right Approach

Choosing between no-code and traditional development comes down to understanding your current needs and anticipating future demands.

Business Factors to Evaluate

Start by looking at your technical resources. If you don’t have in-house developers, no-code platforms can save you from expensive technical hires. On the other hand, if you already have a skilled development team, traditional development might be a better way to leverage your existing talent.

Your budget is another important consideration. No-code platforms often come with subscription-based pricing, which spreads costs over time and simplifies budgeting. Traditional development, while requiring a larger upfront investment, can be a worthwhile long-term asset if it aligns with your business goals.

Think about your timeline for regulatory compliance. If you’re facing tight deadlines – like upcoming EU regulations on battery sustainability – speed is crucial. No-code platforms can help you meet those deadlines faster, while traditional development may take longer and risk delays.

Supply chain complexity also plays a role. For straightforward, linear supply chains, no-code templates might be enough. But if your supply chain is multi-layered or requires specialised verification processes, custom development offers the flexibility to handle those intricacies.

Your data infrastructure is another key factor. If you rely on legacy systems or proprietary databases with unique data structures, traditional development may be necessary to ensure seamless integration. No-code platforms, while convenient, might struggle with unusual configurations.

Consider your scalability needs as well. A smaller business with limited production might find no-code platforms sufficient, as they often scale automatically within service tiers. Larger operations, however, may require the deliberate architecture of traditional systems to handle growth effectively.

Lastly, reflect on your competitive differentiation strategy. If Digital Product Passports (DPPs) are simply a compliance tool for your business, no-code solutions can get the job done. But if you want to use DPPs to engage customers – offering features like interactive repair guides or personalised sustainability content – custom development gives you the creative freedom to stand out.

These factors will help you choose the most suitable development approach based on your operational needs.

Industry-Specific Recommendations

Different industries often have specific requirements that can guide your decision.

In textiles, no-code platforms can handle basic DPP needs, like tracking material sourcing, labour practices, and environmental data. However, brands looking to incorporate advanced features, such as authentication or detailed storytelling about craftsmanship, may eventually need custom development.

For electronics manufacturers, the situation is more complex. While no-code platforms can support basic component tracking for mid-sized companies, larger manufacturers working with proprietary components or warranty systems often require the tailored capabilities of traditional development.

Battery producers face strict regulatory demands. Smaller assemblers might find no-code solutions adequate for basic compliance. Larger manufacturers, however, often need custom systems to integrate with production monitoring, testing, and reporting tools.

In furniture and home goods, no-code platforms are a practical choice. Standard templates can efficiently address DPP requirements, enabling retailers to roll out digital passports across a wide range of products.

For industrial equipment manufacturers, custom development is often the better option. These products typically have long lifecycles and require detailed maintenance records. DPPs for this sector may need to integrate with asset management systems, service scheduling, and performance analytics – features that are better suited to custom solutions.

Aligning DPP Strategy with Sustainability Objectives

Your DPP system should also align with your sustainability goals.

If your priority is rapid transparency, no-code platforms make it easy to share environmental data quickly. You can publish carbon footprint details, material sourcing information, and circularity metrics without waiting for lengthy development processes, building trust with environmentally conscious customers.

For businesses pursuing circular economy models, the choice depends on the complexity of your initiatives. Basic tracking of product location and condition can be managed with no-code solutions. However, more advanced systems – like those coordinating reverse logistics or component harvesting – often require the custom workflows that traditional development provides.

If your goal is to collaborate across the supply chain, ensure your system supports the necessary data exchange protocols. No-code platforms are generally compatible with common standards, while traditional development allows for the integration of emerging or specialised protocols.

Finally, consider your data granularity and engagement strategy. High-level sustainability reporting might work with basic no-code systems. But if you need detailed lifecycle assessments or want to use DPPs for customer engagement – like gamified recycling incentives or personalised tips – custom solutions offer the flexibility to deliver a richer experience.

Ultimately, your DPP approach should complement your sustainability efforts, supporting your environmental goals while staying practical for your team as your business grows and evolves.

Planning for Future Requirements

The world of Digital Product Passports (DPPs) is constantly shifting. What works today might not meet tomorrow’s demands. How you choose to develop your DPP system will determine how smoothly you can adapt to these changes.

Handling Regulatory Changes

To stay ahead, your DPP system must be ready to handle updates in EU regulations.

With no-code platforms, compliance becomes less of a headache. These platforms automatically update templates and data structures whenever new rules come into play. This means you can stay compliant without dedicating significant internal resources. However, you’ll be tied to the platform provider’s update schedule, which might not always align with your needs.

On the other hand, traditional development gives you complete control. Your team can adjust the system as soon as new regulations are announced. While this approach demands dedicated resources and expertise, it allows for quicker responses to regulatory shifts. The right choice depends on how fast your industry regulations evolve and the resources you’re willing to invest. This flexibility also lays the groundwork for adopting cutting-edge technologies.

Integrating New Technologies

As regulations evolve, so do the technologies that enhance DPP efficiency. Emerging tools like blockchain for verification, AI for data analysis, and advanced cryptography are no longer just experimental – they’re becoming practical solutions.

No-code platforms often integrate these new technologies automatically. Features like blockchain verification or AI-powered analytics are made available without requiring in-depth technical knowledge. However, the options you have are limited to what the platform provider offers.

With traditional development, you’re in the driver’s seat. You can integrate technologies on your own timeline, tailoring them to your specific needs. Whether it’s bespoke AI functionalities or advanced data processing methods, a custom-built solution ensures that your system evolves in line with your goals and processes. It’s especially handy for businesses requiring complex integrations or real-time data synchronization.

Building for Long-Term Growth

As your business grows, your DPP system should grow with it. This includes handling not only more users and data but also new ways of leveraging DPPs.

No-code platforms handle straightforward scalability well. They can automatically adjust to increases in data storage and traffic, making them ideal for businesses focused on basic compliance needs. However, if your use of DPPs expands into areas like customer engagement or interactive features, you might hit the platform’s limits.

Traditional development offers more room for growth. Custom systems with modular components can be expanded and modified as needed. Plus, with full control over data structures, you can implement advanced analytics and integrate seamlessly with other business intelligence tools. This makes a custom approach better suited for businesses with evolving and complex needs.

For businesses with limited resources, starting with a no-code solution can be a smart move – it’s quick to deploy and easy to use. As your needs grow and you require more control, transitioning to a custom-built system might be the logical next step.

Ultimately, your approach should balance ease of compliance and scalability with the flexibility to embrace future innovations.

Conclusion

Deciding on the best approach for your DPP system depends entirely on your business’s specific requirements.

No-code platforms like Blippa are perfect for quick setup, keeping costs low, and being user-friendly – especially for businesses with limited technical expertise. They’re a great fit for small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that need to meet compliance requirements efficiently and without significant delays.

On the other hand, traditional development offers unmatched control and the ability to tailor solutions precisely to your needs. If your business operates in a complex environment, requires unique integrations, or handles sensitive data, a custom-built solution can provide the flexibility and security you need.

Ultimately, the choice should align with your unique circumstances. Think about your budget, technical resources, timeline, and how you see your DPP system evolving over time. For example, a textile company with straightforward compliance requirements will approach this differently than an electronics manufacturer juggling intricate supply chains and customer-focused features.

Some businesses opt to start with no-code platforms to quickly achieve compliance, transitioning to custom development as their needs grow. Others take a hybrid route, combining no-code for standard functions with custom-built components for specialised tasks.

Whatever you choose, make sure your solution not only meets current regulations but can also adapt and scale to support your future growth.

FAQs

How can I decide between using a no-code platform or traditional development for Digital Product Passports (DPPs)?

Choosing between a no-code platform and traditional development for Digital Product Passports (DPPs) boils down to your organisation’s specific needs and priorities. Key considerations include scalability, cost, development speed, and how well the solution integrates with existing systems like ERP or PIM.

If you’re looking for a quicker, more budget-friendly option that doesn’t require extensive technical expertise, a no-code platform might be the way to go. On the flip side, traditional development offers greater room for customisation and adaptability, making it a better fit for more complex or large-scale projects, especially when deeper system integration is essential.

Take stock of your current resources, long-term objectives, and sustainability goals to decide which approach best supports your organisation’s vision.

What should Swedish companies consider when adopting Digital Product Passports (DPPs) to meet EU regulations?

Swedish companies must pay close attention to a few critical factors when rolling out Digital Product Passports (DPPs) to meet EU regulations. The first priority is ensuring that the data captured in DPPs adheres to EU standards for transparency and traceability. This means the information provided should be both precise and verifiable, covering the entire lifecycle of the product.

Another key consideration is integrating DPPs with existing systems like ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) and PIM (Product Information Management). Proper integration streamlines data management, simplifies compliance reporting, and cuts down on manual work, which helps minimise errors. By tackling these aspects, companies can not only meet regulatory requirements but also advance their sustainability and operational objectives.

What steps can businesses take to move from a no-code DPP solution to a custom-developed system as their needs grow?

Transitioning from a no-code Digital Product Passport (DPP) solution to a custom-built system doesn’t have to be overwhelming if approached strategically. Start by assessing your current no-code platform to pinpoint its limitations. Pay special attention to areas like scalability, integration with ERP or PIM systems, and whether it supports the level of customisation your business requires.

Once you’ve identified the gaps, map out a phased transition plan to keep disruptions to a minimum. Start with the most critical features, ensuring the custom solution seamlessly integrates with your existing data and workflows. Work closely with developers to address essential goals, including sustainability targets and specific industry regulations, like those for textiles or electronics.

Don’t overlook the financial side of things. Account for costs related to development, testing, and ongoing maintenance, and ensure these align with your long-term growth objectives. With careful preparation, you can achieve a scalable system that balances innovation with operational efficiency.